Re: flyspell + longlines: hang/wait

[Kim F. Storm]

"Richard M. Stallman" <address@hidden> writes:

>     So in my mind, DTWW is not an alternative to e.g. editing with
>     longlines mode, but on the other hand, I don't understand why you
>     oppose DTWW support in Emacs.
>
> I oppose it as an alternative to longlines mode.
> I don't necessarily oppose it as a way of continuing lines,
> but I want to make sure it does not grow into an alternative
> to longlines mode.

I never intended it to be an alternative to longlines mode.  That is
specifically why I have NOT made any attempt to make line-move and
friends treat DTWW differently from normal continued lines.

However, this is probably not the right time to add DTWW ...

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk