[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "M-x locate" regression
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: "M-x locate" regression |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Nov 2005 21:28:19 -0600 (CST) |
Richard Stallman wrote:
The patch in Nick's message includes another change in another place.
It looked like that other change was intended to update files correctly
in both kinds of buffers, but I did not study it. What is that other
change supposed to do?
Take care of *Locate* buffers.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- Re: "M-x locate" regression, (continued)
- Re: "M-x locate" regression, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/11/08
- Re: "M-x locate" regression, Nick Roberts, 2005/11/08
- Re: "M-x locate" regression, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/08
- Re: "M-x locate" regression, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/11/08
- Re: "M-x locate" regression, Nick Roberts, 2005/11/09
- Re: "M-x locate" regression, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/11/09
- Re: "M-x locate" regression, Nick Roberts, 2005/11/09
- Re: "M-x locate" regression, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/11/10
- Re: "M-x locate" regression, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/11/10
- Re: "M-x locate" regression, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/09
- Re: "M-x locate" regression,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: "M-x locate" regression, Nick Roberts, 2005/11/09
Re: "M-x locate" regression, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/11/06