Re: command remapping problem

[Kim F. Storm]

Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:

> 2006/2/1, Kim F. Storm <address@hidden>:
>> + DEFUN ("indirect-function-noerror", Findirect_function_noerror, 
>> Sindirect_function_noerror, 1, 1, 0,
> ...
>> + If the final symbol is unbound, return OBJECT
>
> Instead of making a new function, how about adding an optional
> "default" argument to the existing `indirect-function' function?

I will certainly do that _if_ it solves the problem.  For the test, I
wanted to make the smallest (localized) patch I could think of.

But this may be a good change in its own -- WDPT?

>
> [BTW, you could also get rid of the "and" -- if DEFN is nil, then
> that's just an funbound symbol.]

Yes.

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk