[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Boxes not boxed in the header-line
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Boxes not boxed in the header-line |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:41:24 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> I just noticed this inelegant behavior: in the header-line, when two
> pieces of text have different box settings (but they're both 3d
> boxes), the top and bottom part of the two texts are correctly drawn
> (with their respective 3D effect), but there is not vertical line
> between the two to mark the transition from one to the other.
> Is it really meaningful to have one box immediately after another
> with no space between? Maybe the right solution is to say "so don't
> do that, then".
Notice that in my example, every box is indeed separated from the next one
by a space, but the whole header line is itself marked as boxed by the
header-line face so the separating space is "boxed" as well,
tho differently (e.g. different thickness).
Stefan
- Boxes not boxed in the header-line, Stefan Monnier, 2006/02/23
- Re: Boxes not boxed in the header-line, Richard Stallman, 2006/02/24
- Re: Boxes not boxed in the header-line,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Boxes not boxed in the header-line, Richard Stallman, 2006/02/26
- Re: Boxes not boxed in the header-line, Stefan Monnier, 2006/02/26
- Re: Boxes not boxed in the header-line, Richard Stallman, 2006/02/27
- Re: Boxes not boxed in the header-line, Stefan Monnier, 2006/02/27
- Message not available
- Re: Boxes not boxed in the header-line, Stefan Monnier, 2006/02/28
- Re: Boxes not boxed in the header-line, Stefan Monnier, 2006/02/27