[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: read-abbrev-file (2)
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: read-abbrev-file (2) |
|
Date: |
Thu, 27 Apr 2006 00:36:11 -0400 |
For instance you couldn't call
`quietly-read-abbrev-file' interactively at the moment,
Why would you want to? Given that you're typing a command,
how does it hurt you to use read-abbrev-file instead?
- read-abbrev-file, Andreas Roehler, 2006/04/22
- Re: read-abbrev-file, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/23
- Re: read-abbrev-file (2), Andreas Roehler, 2006/04/25
- Re: read-abbrev-file (2), Richard Stallman, 2006/04/25
- Re: read-abbrev-file (2), Andreas Roehler, 2006/04/26
- Re: read-abbrev-file (2),
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: read-abbrev-file (2), Andreas Roehler, 2006/04/27
- Re: read-abbrev-file (2), Richard Stallman, 2006/04/27
- Re: read-abbrev-file (2), Andreas Roehler, 2006/04/28