Re: read-face-name doc string incorrect

[Kim F. Storm]

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

>> So to me it makes no sense for CONTRIBUTE to _describe_ those files.
>
> Yes, it does: users will see those files described, and will then know
> to look for them when/if they start using the CVS code.

Since the files in admin/ are only marginally useful for the average
contributor, and the _are_ described in admin/README (modulo a few
missing items), I still don't see a need to also describe them in
CONTRIBUTE.

IMHO, CONTRIBUTE should only describe things which are included in the
source tarball -- with the exception of INSTALL.CVS (and perhaps
admin/README if we put something more useful into it).

>> But it do make sense to _mention_ that after downloading the source
>> package from CVS, the first file to read should be INSTALL.CVS.
>
> Yes, that's a good idea.

I have added that.

>
> We could have README.CVS

I like that idea.  If we make it, we should remove admin/README
(and place that information into README.CVS).

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk