Re: beginning-of-defun

[Thien-Thi Nguyen]

Andreas Roehler <address@hidden> writes:

> Wrong, as at the start of the enclosing form.

well, "defun" here actually means "top-level form";
the command works w/ all kinds of sexps, whether or not
they are actually `defun's.

the way to make the behavior arbitrarily more precise is
to customize `beginning-of-defun-function'.  for example,
see `python-beginning-of-defun' in progmodes/python.el.

thi