|
From: | Andreas Roehler |
Subject: | Re: [Fwd: Re: beginning-of-defun] |
Date: | Mon, 17 Jul 2006 08:06:26 +0200 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060516) |
Richard Stallman schrieb:
Thanks for starting to explore this issue. Because it only finds `defun' calls, it fails to find other constructs that define functions or macros. Also, it would get rather confused when dealing with top-level forms that don't define functions at all: it just skips them.
Correct my answer in this point. Here a hopefully better one: What was sent indeed was a `beginning-of-defun' in his true understanding (as I conceive that) - nothing more. After that we could have a function dealing with a group of function-forms in Emacs Lisp while extending the reg-rexp appropriate, i.e. a `beginning-of-function'. __ Andreas Roehler
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |