|
| From: | Richard Stallman |
| Subject: | Re: [Fwd: Re: beginning-of-defun] |
| Date: | Mon, 17 Jul 2006 20:13:11 -0400 |
What was sent indeed was a `beginning-of-defun' in his
true understanding (as I conceive that) - nothing more.
In Emacs we have used the term "defun" to mean "top level expression"
for 30 years. There is no reason to change that.
So the question I am considering what kind of behavior a user editing
Emacs Lisp code might find more useful than the current C-M-a
behavior.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |