[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: region face has no background by default for new frames?
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: region face has no background by default for new frames? |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Jul 2006 21:04:23 -0700 |
Eval these: (face-background 'region) ==> "lightgoldenrod2"
(face-background 'region t) ==> nil
The latter seems wrong to me. If I read the doc string of
`face-background' correctly, this would be saying that "the default
[background] for face region (for new frames)" is nil. And that
doesn't seem correct.
I think that the "default for new frames" does not include what is
specified in the defface. It is what you set by calling
set-face-background and specifying t for the frame. That overrides
what the defface says; but usually it isn't specified nowadays.
I tried to clarify the test in the Emacs Lisp manual.
Please take a look.
Can you please tell me where to look?
- region face has no background by default for new frames?, Drew Adams, 2006/07/28
- Re: region face has no background by default for new frames?, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/28
- RE: region face has no background by default for new frames?,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: region face has no background by default for new frames?, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/29
- RE: region face has no background by default for new frames?, Drew Adams, 2006/07/29
- Re: region face has no background by default for new frames?, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/07/29
- RE: region face has no background by default for new frames?, Drew Adams, 2006/07/29
- Re: region face has no background by default for new frames?, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/07/30
- RE: region face has no background by default for new frames?, Drew Adams, 2006/07/30
- Re: region face has no background by default for new frames?, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/31