Re: doc string for string-key-binding unclear

[Stefan Monnier]

> I note, too, that the only places where this function is used always
> use this idiom: (or (string-key-binding key) (key-binding key t))
> where the `t' is sometimes absent. This brings to mind the question
> whether `string-key-binding' should in fact be a separate function,
> or should just have its functionality rolled into `key-binding'.

Thanks for asking.  The functionality has been included in key-binding a few
days ago, as a matter of fact, and I believe string-key-binding can thus be
(or has been) removed.


        Stefan