[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode"
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode" |
|
Date: |
Sat, 25 Nov 2006 21:01:06 -0500 |
font-lock-support-mode has a doc string because it's a variable
and has a slot for one, but we have not documented it in the manual
because it doesn't seem important enough to mention.
Now that there is just one recommended support mode, it is even
less important than it used to be. So I don't think we should
make the Emacs Manual bigger by adding it.
- "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode", ishikawa, 2006/11/20
- Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode", Jason Rumney, 2006/11/20
- Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode", Richard Stallman, 2006/11/21
- Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode", ishikawa, 2006/11/22
- Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode", Richard Stallman, 2006/11/22
- Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode", ishikawa, 2006/11/24
- Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode",
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode", ishikawa, 2006/11/27
- Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode", Eli Zaretskii, 2006/11/27
- Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode", ishikawa, 2006/11/28