Re: (make-frame-visible), doesn't

[Jan Djärv]

Stefan Monnier skrev:
> > else then I guess it's OK to use that, but isn't it odd to refer to a
> > window you can't see as being visible?  Maybe not.  Australia's
>
> Maybe instead of talking about "visible" we should carefully stick to
> "visibility" and "invisible".  E.g.
>
>    make-frame-visible is an interactive built-in function in `src/frame.c'.
>    (make-frame-visible &optional FRAME)
>    
>    Set the visibility of frame FRAME (assuming it is an X window).
>    If omitted, FRAME defaults to the currently selected frame.

I think the documentation for make-frame-visible and make-frame-invisible 
should match.  Would it be better to just add:

     Note, this may not raise FRAME to the top, use `raise-frame´ for that.

Does w32 and mac have make-frame-invisible?  In that case we should remove the 
X window part from that function also.

        Jan D.