[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs 22.0.91 working, lazy-lock documentation inconsistency?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs 22.0.91 working, lazy-lock documentation inconsistency? |
Date: |
Fri, 01 Dec 2006 21:26:40 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.91 (gnu/linux) |
> However, I had to comment out lazy-lock from my .emacs.
Why? (I mean, it's good that you did, but Emacs should still work just fine
with lazy-lock: i.e. should not have been forced)
> I see the .el file is now is lisp/obsolete where it does not get installed
> by default,
It does get installed. And it is autoloaded. The intention is that it be
less visible but still fully functional, so that old users can keep using it
if they feel like, but new users are unlikely to end up using it by mistake.
> and it is not mentioned in the info pages, but it does appear
> in the documentation for font-lock-support-mode as simply "no
> longer recommended."
That looks right.
Stefan
- Emacs 22.0.91 working, lazy-lock documentation inconsistency?, Roland Roberts, 2006/12/01
- Re: Emacs 22.0.91 working, lazy-lock documentation inconsistency?,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Emacs 22.0.91 working, lazy-lock documentation inconsistency?, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/01
- Re: Emacs 22.0.91 working, lazy-lock documentation inconsistency?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/02
- Re: Emacs 22.0.91 working, lazy-lock documentation inconsistency?, Roland Roberts, 2006/12/02
- Re: Emacs 22.0.91 working, lazy-lock documentation inconsistency?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/12/02
- Re: Emacs 22.0.91 working, lazy-lock documentation inconsistency?, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/03
- Re: Emacs 22.0.91 working, lazy-lock documentation inconsistency?, Roland Roberts, 2006/12/03
- Re: Emacs 22.0.91 working, lazy-lock documentation inconsistency?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/12/03
- Re: Emacs 22.0.91 working, lazy-lock documentation inconsistency?, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/12/03
- Re: Emacs 22.0.91 working, lazy-lock documentation inconsistency?, Lennart Borgman, 2006/12/03