[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
ibuffer vs. double width characters
From: |
Dan Jacobson |
Subject: |
ibuffer vs. double width characters |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Dec 2006 23:59:54 +0800 |
Gentlemen, looking at ibuffer,
MR Name Size Mode Filename/Process
-- ---- ---- ---- ----------------
[ Default ]
% *BBDB* 47 BBDB
% *Help* 942 Help
% maintenance 9238 Dired by name
/var/lib/mediawikibus/maintenance/
Category_Talk:自... 212 Text
~/bus/wiki/Category_Talk:自由路口_-_Ziyou_Rd._Jct.
notes 1870 Text ~/bus/wiki/notes
分類:台中技術學院_-_Tai... 226 Text
~/bus/wiki/分類:台中技術學院_-_Taizhong_Technical_College
% fromjidanni1 4322 Dired by date /cf/fromjidanni1/
We notice they sure blew it with the character width. From looking at
the indentation, they assume that double width (Chinese) characters
are single width!
Also if one turns on show-trailing-whitespace, whitespace of shame is
revealed. However, as this buffer isn't usually saved to a file, I
can still go on with my life in this case.
(Debian emacs-snapshot package, version 1:20060923-1) sorry so old
here in modem land.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- ibuffer vs. double width characters,
Dan Jacobson <=