Re: Should let symbols be interned?

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 03:49:55 +0100
> From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" <address@hidden>
> 
>    (let (this-was-no-symbol))
> 
> Then evaluate the intern-soft line again. Now the variable is interned.
> 
> Should let symbols be interned this way?

Maybe it looks strange at 3:49am ;-).  How else do you expect the Lisp
reader to let-bind a symbol?  The obarray is the way symbols are
communicated between different parts of ELisp code.