[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should let symbols be interned?
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Should let symbols be interned? |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Jan 2007 02:13:38 +0100 |
On 1/22/07, Lennart Borgman (gmail) <address@hidden> wrote:
Then perhaps it would make sense to have a small obarray for let
variables.
You've said that you would expect my example to be "transparent to the
user/programmer". For that to be true, anything that uses a symbol
should have to search first in your special let-obarray and then in
the general one. Hard to see an advantage there.
/L/e/k/t/u
- Should let symbols be interned?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/01/19
- Re: Should let symbols be interned?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/01/20
- Re: Should let symbols be interned?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/01/21
- Re: Should let symbols be interned?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/01/21
- Re: Should let symbols be interned?, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/01/21
- Re: Should let symbols be interned?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/01/21
- Re: Should let symbols be interned?, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/01/21
- Re: Should let symbols be interned?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/01/21
- Re: Should let symbols be interned?,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: Should let symbols be interned?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/01/21
- Re: Should let symbols be interned?, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/01/21
- Re: Should let symbols be interned?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/01/21
- Re: Should let symbols be interned?, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/01/22
- Re: Should let symbols be interned?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/01/21
- Re: Should let symbols be interned?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/01/22
- Re: Should let symbols be interned?, Miles Bader, 2007/01/21
- Re: Should let symbols be interned?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/01/22
- Re: Should let symbols be interned?, Miles Bader, 2007/01/22
- Re: Should let symbols be interned?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/01/22