[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should let symbols be interned?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Should let symbols be interned? |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Jan 2007 23:11:10 +0200 |
> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:26:44 +0100
> From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> >
> > (intern-soft "my-uninterned-var")
> > => nil
> > (let ((#1=#:my-uninterned-var 5))
> > (+ #1# 3))
> > => 8
> > (intern-soft "my-uninterned-var")
> > => nil
> >
> > -Miles
>
>
> Thanks. I have never seent that syntax. I guess it is "unofficial"?
It's entirely official; see `(elisp)Symbol Type', near the end. (I
found that place by typing "i # RET" in the ELisp manual, then hitting
`,' a few times.)
- Re: Should let symbols be interned?, (continued)
- Re: Should let symbols be interned?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/01/21
- Re: Should let symbols be interned?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/01/22
- Re: Should let symbols be interned?, Miles Bader, 2007/01/21
- Re: Should let symbols be interned?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/01/22
- Re: Should let symbols be interned?, Miles Bader, 2007/01/22
- Re: Should let symbols be interned?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/01/22
- Re: Should let symbols be interned?, Miles Bader, 2007/01/22
- Re: Should let symbols be interned?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Should let symbols be interned?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/01/21
- Re: Should let symbols be interned?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/01/22
- Re: Should let symbols be interned?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/01/22