[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (that binding is currently shadowed ...)
|
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
|
Subject: |
Re: (that binding is currently shadowed ...) |
|
Date: |
Wed, 24 Jan 2007 01:28:25 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> !(KEYMAPP (definition) && KEYMAPP (tem))
>
> should be done outside the other `if', so that it also prevents using
> `continue' if mention_shadow is 0. OTOH in the case of EQ (tem, definition)
> we still want to continue unconditionally.
Seems right -- I've checked in a different change.
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk