|
From: | Jan Djärv |
Subject: | Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs |
Date: | Thu, 25 Jan 2007 08:21:50 +0100 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070102) |
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu skrev:
So, in order for BLOCK_INPUT to work reliably, it seems that interrupt_input_blocked should be declared as volatile (or maybe `volatile sig_atomic_t' instead of `volatile int') because it is accessed from a signal handler.
I think volatile int is OK, I'm sure some systems don't define sig_atomic_t. Jan D.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |