[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Jan 2007 05:53:29 -0500 |
So, in order for BLOCK_INPUT to work reliably, it seems that
interrupt_input_blocked should be declared as volatile (or maybe
`volatile sig_atomic_t' instead of `volatile int') because it is
accessed from a signal handler.
Isn't it the case that the C spec calls for this to be volatile?
- Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs, (continued)
- Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs, Chris Moore, 2007/01/11
- Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs, Stefan Monnier, 2007/01/13
- Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs, Jan Djärv, 2007/01/13
- Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs, Chris Moore, 2007/01/14
- Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs, Jan Djärv, 2007/01/15
- Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2007/01/23
- Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs, Chris Moore, 2007/01/24
- Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2007/01/24
- Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs, Jan Djärv, 2007/01/25
- Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs, Richard Stallman, 2007/01/25
- Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs, Jan Djärv, 2007/01/25
- Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs, Jan Djärv, 2007/01/09
- Re: 4 week-old pretest bugs, Chris Moore, 2007/01/10