[emms-help] Re: about emms-player-finished-hook

[Michael Olson]

William Xu <address@hidden> writes:

> Jorgen Schaefer <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> William Xu <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Maybe emms-next-noerror is *not* "a good function to put in
>>> `emms-player-finished-hook'." now? I suggest we directly call it after
>>> emms-player-finished-hook?
>>
>> Hm. I'd want it to be customizable.
>>
>> Quick poll:
>>
>> `emms-player-next-hook' or `emms-player-next-function'?
>
> `emms-player-next-function'. :-)

Seconded.

-- 
Michael Olson -- FSF Associate Member #652 -- http://www.mwolson.org/
Interests: Emacs Lisp, text markup, protocols -- Jabber: mwolson_at_hcoop.net
  /` |\ | | | IRC: freenode.net/mwolson: #emacs, #hcoop, #muse, #PurdueLUG
 |_] | \| |_| Projects: Emacs, Muse, ERC, EMMS, Planner, ErBot, DVC

pgpS9UFTdbntA.pgp
Description: PGP signature