|
From: | Ernest Byers |
Subject: | [Ffss-dev] caprice comforting |
Date: | Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:24:02 +0900 |
In other words, good behavioral organization
reflects human activity structure, not dictionary classification.
Part of this adaptation is a shift towards Designer
as generalist, or one who can provide value regardless of the medium in which they
are required to work.
The advances in neuro-science that keep showing us
how emotion plays a crucial role in decision making.
And some even put beer next to the diapers, so that
when a shopper makes a late night, emergency trip to get more diapers, why there is
the beer, temptingly convenient. Part of this adaptation is a shift towards Designer
as generalist, or one who can provide value regardless of the medium in which they
are required to work.
There is no way to communicate with my car: all the
communication is one way. Or at least makes them feel that it's their fault for not
instantly getting it. Or rather, dumbed-down products. This post, however, is about
the software, product, web site, service, itself.
In other words, good behavioral organization
reflects human activity structure, not dictionary classification.
Sensible, well-organized logical design would not
support this real behavior. This is changing the context of use. More usability
testing? How about focusing on usability and the user experience? Let's review some
of that research, a brief glimpse at the science behind what the poster is
communicating. These kinds of connections are missing today.
But there our users sit, apparently content to hang
out in the "competent" zone, happy they no longer suck, but unmotivated to push
forward. And some even put beer next to the diapers, so that when a shopper makes a
late night, emergency trip to get more diapers, why there is the beer, temptingly
convenient. But there our users sit, apparently content to hang out in the
"competent" zone, happy they no longer suck, but unmotivated to push
forward.
So the Brennan Center study most certainly does not
make this suggestion.
To support this approach,requirements were gathered
from user interface designers,product managers, UI developers, and product
developers. The seats straighten, the seat belts tighten, and then the dashboard
starts beeping at me.
While Designers have always considered themselves
Renaissance types, I see a very obvious convergence between the Graphic Designer,
Industrial Designer, and the aforementioned Interaction Designer.
Human behavior seldom follows mathematical logic
and reasoning. There is not a successful, established approach and framework for
closely linking the real-world needs and desires of our potential customers into the
DNA of product strategy and development. Thus, smart food stores put potato chips
and pretzels next to the beer. Raise your hand if you felt intimidated and maybe
even a bit humiliated that after upgrading you could no longer do some of the
simplest things.
Hammers are in the hammer section where they are
all logically arranged. Machines have less power than humans, so they have more
power.
What Tufte did is that he improved the design
dramatically by taking away content and clarifying what was left. What of the bottom
left?
Thus a new wave of User Interface issues has
occurred in the software development life cycle.
|
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |