[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [fluid-dev] fluidsynth and ladcca2
From: |
Josh Green |
Subject: |
Re: [fluid-dev] fluidsynth and ladcca2 |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Jan 2004 12:25:18 -0800 |
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 09:02, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since ladcca2 has been released some time ago, would it be possible to
> have a new tarball released, building against ladcca2 ? Otherwise what
> would be the patch ? ATM, I only see
>
> address@hidden:/tmp]$ diff -u configure.ac configure.ac.new
> --- configure.ac 2004-01-21 18:00:31.000000000 +0100
> +++ configure.ac.new 2004-01-21 18:01:23.000000000 +0100
> @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@
> ])
>
> if test "$fluid_enable_ladcca" = "yes"; then
> - PKG_CHECK_MODULES(LADCCA, ladcca-1.0 >= 0.3, LADCCA_FOUND="yes",
> LADCCA_FOUND="no")
> + PKG_CHECK_MODULES(LADCCA, ladcca-2.0 >= 0.4, LADCCA_FOUND="yes",
> LADCCA_FOUND="no")
> AC_SUBST(LADCCA_CFLAGS)
> AC_SUBST(LADCCA_LIBS)
>
>
>From what I can tell LADCCA is still ladcca-1.0 so I think that
pkg-config line is fine, since things should theoretically work with 0.3
as well? Although there were some changes in relation to some constants
which might break backwards compatibility. It might make sense to put
"ladcca-1.0 >= 0.4".
You are right though, a new FluidSynth package should be released, there
are a number of bug fixes and other things. What FluidSynth really needs
though is some more developers to take over the project. Between my
other projects it seems to get the lowest priority, so I don't get
around to doing anything with it. I'll post something more formally
soon. Cheers.
Josh Green