[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[fluid-dev] Multiple fluidsynth instances or all-in-one?
From: |
Ken Restivo |
Subject: |
[fluid-dev] Multiple fluidsynth instances or all-in-one? |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:51:23 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On an SMP system (Intel Core Duo), does fluidsynth spawn off child
threads/processes for each midi channel active?
Right now I have multiple fluidsynth instances, one for each MIDI instrument,
and I patch them using qjackctl. I suppose I could also have only one
fluidsynth instance, with all my soundfonts loaded, and use fluidsynth's
routing and different MIDI channels to send the various signals to the correct
instrument.
Which approach would make the most sense on an SMP machine?
- -ken
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFrcdre8HF+6xeOIcRAsw7AJ0Ukz9nGE4IHwV4qQQsZFgQ1HA68gCfYcQ1
WlY5rDuVfSLN53/GOzFxisE=
=ciY8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [fluid-dev] Multiple fluidsynth instances or all-in-one?,
Ken Restivo <=