[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [fluid-dev] License trouble for Debian
From: |
Josh Green |
Subject: |
Re: [fluid-dev] License trouble for Debian |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:26:42 -0700 |
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 21:30 +0200, David Henningsson wrote:
> Josh Green skrev:
> > Any suggestion on what licenses are most
> > appropriate for documentation?
>
> That's seems to be a difficult question. I tried to do some research and
> currently it seems like Creative Commons Share-Alike v3.0 is the most
> bright shining star:
>
> * It's accepted by Debian
>
> * Wikipedia is planning to change to that license, and FSF has accepted
> that the license will be used as a successor to GFDL (at least for
> wikipedia?).
>
> But I'm really not an expert on that subject.
>
> // David
>
Guess I was repeating the question in that previous email I wrote. I
should read my email backwards ;) I think CC SA 3.0 sounds good to me.
Josh