[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [fluid-dev] possible 1.1.3 bug
From: |
Max McCracken |
Subject: |
Re: [fluid-dev] possible 1.1.3 bug |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:40:50 +0400 |
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Ray Rashif <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 20 October 2010 15:03, Max McCracken <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Matt Giuca <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>> > (Btw I am not a FluidSynth developer, I'm just interested.)
>>>>
>>>> Oh? Should I also post a bug report somewhere then?
>>>
>>> There is a bug tracker here:
>>> http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/fluidsynth/report
>>>
>>> I don't think it gets used much though. It only has 6 active tickets. I get
>>> the feeling that bug reports get more exposure on this list than that
>>> tracker.
>>>
>>
>> Okay then, I won't bother :)
>
> That's really not the right attitude - you are harming yourself. No
> matter the traffic, filing bug reports is a good habit. Keeping
> problems stored away in discussions is only a way to lose them.
>
> One or two bugs did get solved within the last month in the tracker.
https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/fluidsynth/ticket/91
No problem, I just got the wrong impression.
- [fluid-dev] possible 1.1.3 bug, Max McCracken, 2010/10/19
- Re: [fluid-dev] possible 1.1.3 bug, Matt Giuca, 2010/10/19
- Re: [fluid-dev] possible 1.1.3 bug, Max McCracken, 2010/10/20
- Re: [fluid-dev] possible 1.1.3 bug, Matt Giuca, 2010/10/20
- Re: [fluid-dev] possible 1.1.3 bug, Max McCracken, 2010/10/20
- Re: [fluid-dev] possible 1.1.3 bug, Matt Giuca, 2010/10/20
- Re: [fluid-dev] possible 1.1.3 bug, Max McCracken, 2010/10/20
- Re: [fluid-dev] possible 1.1.3 bug, Ray Rashif, 2010/10/20
- Re: [fluid-dev] possible 1.1.3 bug,
Max McCracken <=