freebangfont-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Freebangfont-devel] RE: [Bengalinux-core] Conjunct encoding/representa


From: Ahmed, Taneem
Subject: [Freebangfont-devel] RE: [Bengalinux-core] Conjunct encoding/representation?
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 14:59:09 -0800

Shaheed,

You woke up at the right time, we started talking about having standardized
OT layout tables for Bangla fonts just last week. But that discussion is
going on at address@hidden (FYI: FreeBanglaFont
(http://www.nongnu.org/freebangfont) is the "font wing" of bengalinux.org).
I proposed a flow to ease the pain of creating OpenType fonts, but
Sayamindu, Deepayan, and Ripon brought up few good points (if you have time
please read the thread
http://mail.nongnu.org/archive/html/freebangfont-devel/2003-01/msg00007.html
). Well I was dreaming of having a very simply flow, and now I realize it
won't be that simple, especially because of the GPOS tables. But I am sure
we will come up with something.

btw, lets move the discussion to where it belong :)

Taneem

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Shaheed R. Haque [mailto:address@hidden
>Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 2:46 PM
>To: address@hidden; Sayamindu Dasgupta
>Cc: address@hidden
>Subject: Re: [Bengalinux-core] Conjunct encoding/representation?
>
>
>
>Sayamindu,
>
>Hi...I think you have given me at least half the answer...
>
>> Actually, as far as I understand, the usage of the private area is
>> immaterial. The glyphs there are never called directly. The 
>position is
>> defined in the OTF tables, and that handles all the hard stuff. For
>> example, if you have a glyph cluster of Ka Hasanta Ka, the 
>tables will
>> substitute that cluster with a single glyph for Kae-Ka.
>
>OK, it sounds like these OTF tables include the logic I was 
>trying to describe. 
>So now, the remaining part of my question is: can these tables 
>be standardised? 
>I assume that if they could, then it would CONSIDERABLY reduce 
>the effort of 
>designing a font that included conjuncts?
>
>Or am I dreaming?
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
>SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
>http://www.vasoftware.com
>_______________________________________________
>Bengalinux-core mailing list
>address@hidden
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bengalinux-core
>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]