[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Freeipmi-devel] [task #3320] sensors output based on critical/non-recov
From: |
Anand Babu |
Subject: |
[Freeipmi-devel] [task #3320] sensors output based on critical/non-recoverable ranges |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Sep 2004 19:48:53 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040823 Firefox/0.9.3 |
This mail is an automated notification from the task tracker
of the project: FreeIPMI.
/**************************************************************************/
[task #3320] Latest Modifications:
Changes by:
Anand Babu <address@hidden>
'Date:
Thu 09/02/2004 at 23:44 (US/Pacific)
What | Removed | Added
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution | None | Done
Percent Complete | 0% | None
Status | Open | Closed
------------------ Additional Follow-up Comments ----------------------------
Rewrote sensors status determination logic. Sensors should now
report status correctly.
/**************************************************************************/
[task #3320] Full Item Snapshot:
URL: <http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?func=detailitem&item_id=3320>
Project: FreeIPMI
Submitted by: Albert Chu
On: Fri 06/11/2004 at 17:11
Should Start On: Fri 06/11/2004 at 00:00
Should be Finished on: Fri 06/11/2004 at 00:00
Category: None
Priority: 5 - Normal
Resolution: Done
Privacy: Public
Assigned to: None
Percent Complete: None
Status: Closed
Effort: 0.00
Summary: sensors output based on critical/non-recoverable ranges
Original Submission: From email:
-----------
Hey AB,
We've noticed on a thunder that as many as 50% of nodes are showings
alerts for voltage sensors. I don't believe this is bad, b/c the
voltages are within the lower and upper critical range. However, since
fish/sensors uses the normal min/max range, many sensors are showing
alerts (IMHO) more often than is appropriate.
I'm in discussion with the admins about their preference for output of
ranges and alerts, but I think something should be changed in
fish/sensors. If I understand this correctly, we can use the readable
threshold mask (field 20 of the full sensor data record) to determine
which ranges are available.
I'm going to add a feature request on this to FreeIPMI so we don't forget.
Al
Follow-up Comments
------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu 09/02/2004 at 23:44 By: Anand Babu <ab>
Rewrote sensors status determination logic. Sensors should now
report status correctly.
For detailed info, follow this link:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?func=detailitem&item_id=3320>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.nongnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Freeipmi-devel] [task #3320] sensors output based on critical/non-recoverable ranges,
Anand Babu <=