Re: [pooma-dev] [PATCH] Re: Two New Array Failures

[Richard Guenther]

On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Richard Guenther wrote:

> Hi!
>
> The attached patch canonicalizes Engine::domain() const to return a
> const reference to its domain. It can do so by adding a domain_m
> member to the expression engine (pls review this part carefully, as
> in some of the constructors we might do things more optimally if I
> had understood what they actually do...).
>
> (We might do something similar to the Engine::layout() const methods,
> though this would affect many more engines to be added a layout_m member)
>
> Testing is still in progress, but the concept sounds reasonable?

Build and testing completed with no regressions in Engine, Array and Field
on ppc-linux with gcc 3.2.3

Ok to apply?

Thanks, Richard.