[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Freepooma-devel] [PATCH] PathScale EKOPath compiler support
From: |
Bryan O'Sullivan |
Subject: |
Re: [Freepooma-devel] [PATCH] PathScale EKOPath compiler support |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Mar 2005 08:45:32 -0800 |
On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 09:33 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> Well in all the shipped benchmarks you'll get output like
> (BlitzLoops):
> where the ultimate goal is to have CppTran and PoomaII numbers
> be equal or better (higher - these are sort of MFLOPs) than
> the C and C restrict numbers. Here we assume that the compilers
> are already very good at optimizing the C code, which is usually
> true.
Thanks for the descriptions. I'll take a look and see what numbers we
get. What kind of hardware did you get those numbers on, by the way?
We have a variety of stuff here, so I can try to reproduce your numbers.
<b
--
Bryan O'Sullivan <address@hidden>