Re: BUG: op_div

[Pavel Kankovsky]

On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Marco Schmidt wrote:

>  case op_div:
>               if (top[1])
>                   *top++ = top[0] / top[1];
>             else

Yes, this code is broken. C does not define the order of evaluation of
side-effects wrt other occurrences of the affected variable in the same
expression. This is not a compiler bug (otoh, I'd expect the compiler to
fill the screen with warnings when it encounters such a piece of code).

--Pavel Kankovsky aka Peak  [ Boycott Microsoft--http://www.vcnet.com/bms ]
"Resistance is futile. Open your source code and prepare for assimilation."