[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Devel] Re: FIXED: pure CFF fonts and advanced widths
From: |
Tom Kacvinsky |
Subject: |
[Devel] Re: FIXED: pure CFF fonts and advanced widths |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Nov 2000 09:41:53 -0500 (EST) |
Well, this fixed the problems that Eirc Blinn reported with example.cff
(excepting the horizontal flip), but I still have some pure CFF fonts that don't
display properly. I don't know what is going on...
Tom
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Tom Kacvinsky wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I tracked the problem with weird horizontal advancements down to a
> "bug" in the charstrings parsing code. I have commited a patch for
> this -- let me know if it fixes your problems with pure CFF fonts.
> It does for me. :)
>
> Tom
>
> On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Tom Kacvinsky wrote:
>
> > I have been seeing some of th same errors regarding advanced widths in pure
> > CFF
> > fonts taht Eric Blinn has reported. I can't seem to track it down, but I
> > here
> > is what I have found:
> >
> > If I take a OpenType/CFF font and extract the CFF table, the resulting pure
> > CFF
> > font does not display properly: all of the glyphs overwrite one another.
> >
> > If, on the other hand, I use ftview to display the OpenType/CFf font, the
> > glyphs
> > display properly.
> >
> > I tend to think that there is more metrics parsing going on for OpenType/CFF
> > fonts than there is for pure CFF fonts. A quick scan of the code sort of
> > enforces this view point.
> >
> > By the way, the code in t2parse, does not set decoder.builder.advance.x
> > based on
> > the advanced width given in a charstring.
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://www.freetype.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>