[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Devel] Patch needed to compile freetype-2.0.1 on Windows XP64 Beta
From: |
Tom Kacvinsky |
Subject: |
Re: [Devel] Patch needed to compile freetype-2.0.1 on Windows XP64 Beta 1 |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Mar 2001 10:24:34 -0500 (EST) |
Hi,
Thanks for the time to look at 64 bit issues!
I had 64 bit compilation issues a fair amount of time ago, but I don't to cast
so many variables and/or assignments. This was on a Tru64 UNIX box.
I'll take a closer look at this later today. I have a favor to ask: can you
apply the same patches against the CVS code? There were enough changes between
2.0.1 and 2.0.2 test (and CVS) that applying this patch *might* be difficult
(but do-able).
Tom
On Sat, 10 Mar 2001, Henrik Grubbström wrote:
> The attached patch is needed to compile freetype-2.0.1 on Windows XP
> (formerly known as Codename Whistler) 64-bit (ie IA64) Beta 1 with
> MicroSoft's lc-compiler. The changes mostly have to do with adding
> explicit casts where information is potentially lost (most notably
> pointers are 64-bit quantities, and ptrdiff_t and size_t are thus 64-bit).
>
- [Devel] Patch needed to compile freetype-2.0.1 on Windows XP64 Beta 1, Henrik Grubbström, 2001/03/09
- Re: [Devel] Patch needed to compile freetype-2.0.1 on Windows XP64 Beta 1,
Tom Kacvinsky <=
- Re: [Devel] Patch needed to compile freetype-2.0.1 on Windows XP64 Beta 1, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/03/10
- [Devel] 16, 32, and 64 bit ints [was: Patch needed to compile freetype-2.0.1 on Windows XP64 Beta 1], Tom Kacvinsky, 2001/03/10
- Re: [Devel] 16, 32, and 64 bit ints [was: Patch needed to compile freetype-2.0.1 on Windows XP64 Beta 1], Henrik Grubbström, 2001/03/10
- Re: [Devel] 16, 32, and 64 bit ints [was: Patch needed to compile freetype-2.0.1 on Windows XP64 Beta 1], Werner LEMBERG, 2001/03/10
- Re: [Devel] Patch needed to compile freetype-2.0.1 on Windows XP64 Beta 1, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/03/10