freetype-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Devel] Re: [Freetype] Re: [ttf2pt1-devel] about FT2 parser


From: Edward Lee
Subject: [Devel] Re: [Freetype] Re: [ttf2pt1-devel] about FT2 parser
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 00:33:37 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.0i

Hello Werner,

On Mon, Apr 29, 2002, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> 
> >   But still produce the odd *.afm file, my example is bsmi00lp.ttf.
> >   in my bsmi00lp06.afm,
> >
> > C 27 ; WX 1000 ; N ZdZ2708 ; B 41 322 956 25886 ;
> >                                           ^^^^^
> >
> >   So the bsmi00lp06.tfm(from afm2tfm) cannot use by TeX,
> >
> > % Args: -GE -pft -Ohub -W4 -L cubig5.map+06 bsmi00lp.ttf bsmi00lp06
> 
> Using the CVS of ttf2pt1 from Apr. 22nd, and using the CVS from
> FreeType 2 of today, and using exactly your command line, I get the
> right result:
> 
>   ...
>   C 26 ; WX 1000 ; N _d_2433 ; B 30 -83 964 844 ;
>   C 27 ; WX 1000 ; N _d_2708 ; B 41 -47 956 818 ;
>   C 28 ; WX 1000 ; N _d_2711 ; B 25 -89 969 822 ;
>   ...

  It might be off topic, sorry. But I DID find a strange thing.
  * maybe just my ignorance.

  yes, if just one line command, then everything is OK. But if
  you try the sh script the weird thing happen(see attachment).

> I'm working on a Linux box, and I've compiled everything with gcc
> 2.95.3 (using `-O0 -g' in case this matters).

  Yes, I try gcc-2.95.3 and gcc-2.96(Red Hat version), but seems
  not the gcc's fault.

  Thanks.


Rgds,
Edward G.J. Lee

Attachment: mkfont
Description: Text document


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]