[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Devel] Re: [PATCH] TrueType regression
From: |
Lars Knoll |
Subject: |
Re: [Devel] Re: [PATCH] TrueType regression |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Dec 2003 16:03:48 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.1 |
On Friday 12 December 2003 20:33, ismail \(cartman\) donmez wrote:
> Quoting Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden>:
> > Not so fast! Can you report your observations to the people who've
> > written the browser you are using? I would like to get opinions.
>
> That would be Qt people because all KDE apps uses Qt backend for fonts . So
> I am CC'ing Lars Knoll from Trolltech .
We are not doing anything really special for freetype fonts.
There is however one change we did inside Qt between 3.2.2 and 3.2.3 that
affect font rendering, when you're using a 75 dpi display. That fix might
lead to slightly smaller fonts, but they are usually a lot better readable.
The problem was that Qt 3.2.2. requested non integer pixels size from
freetype, leading to rather some fonts being rendered rather ugly (at least
with my version of freetype, and I was this on some other machines as well).
This has been fixed in 3.2.3, and the sizes we request from freetype are now
always integer pixel sizes.
> > In general, I think that my change is an improvement, but certain
> > programs might have implemented work-arounds to compensate the former
> > incorrect behaviour of FreeType, and those work-arounds might yield
> > worse results now.
What kind of incorrect behaviour? I couldn't find the patch or change you're
talking about in recent mails to this list.
> Maybe Lars can tell us if Qt work-arounds the behaviour. Btw I am using Qt
> 3.2.2
>
> Btw the start of the thread is at
> http://www.freetype.org/pipermail/devel/2003-December/009931.html .
To be honest, I can see that the font got smaller (which could be my change to
Qt 3.2.3), but I can't see that rendering in itself got worse.
Cheers,
Lars