[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] more thoughts on cubic spline flattening
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] more thoughts on cubic spline flattening |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:25:57 +0200 (CEST) |
> In answer to question B: I don't know; perhaps Werner can answer. I
> don't follow everything on the FreeType list, and have long periods
> when I haven't time to look at anything.
If I understand David correctly, he wants you to present the details
which have motivated you to work on the flattening algorithm. In
other words, do you have a font or test case which triggers an
excessive number of subdivisions with the old algorithm?
Werner
- Re: [ft-devel] more thoughts on cubic spline flattening, (continued)
- Re: [ft-devel] more thoughts on cubic spline flattening, Graham Asher, 2010/09/03
- RE: [ft-devel] more thoughts on cubic spline flattening, David Bevan, 2010/09/03
- Re: [ft-devel] more thoughts on cubic spline flattening, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/09/03
- Re: [ft-devel] more thoughts on cubic spline flattening, Graham Asher, 2010/09/03
- RE: [ft-devel] more thoughts on cubic spline flattening, David Bevan, 2010/09/03
- RE: [ft-devel] more thoughts on cubic spline flattening, David Bevan, 2010/09/03
- Re: [ft-devel] more thoughts on cubic spline flattening, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/09/03
- Re: [ft-devel] more thoughts on cubic spline flattening, Graham Asher, 2010/09/04
- Re: [ft-devel] more thoughts on cubic spline flattening, Graham Asher, 2010/09/05
- Re: [ft-devel] more thoughts on cubic spline flattening, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/09/05
- Re: [ft-devel] more thoughts on cubic spline flattening,
Werner LEMBERG <=