Re: [ft-devel] Regression issue - CFF

[suzuki toshiya]

Oops, slipped to attach screenshot.

Regards,
mpsuzuki

suzuki toshiya wrote:
> Just I've checked Adobe Reader 5.0 on Mac OS X 10.3,
> it displays the text (as attached picture).
> However, it makes Preview.app (2.1.0 v211) crashed.
> Also, font previewer of Mac OS X 10.3 does not show
> anything for test.otf.
> 
> Should I ask Adobe experts about if this is a regression,
> or, appropriate behaviour to prevent some vulnerability
> issue?
> 
> Regards,
> mpsuzuki
> 
> suzuki toshiya wrote:
>> Sorry, I don't have working older Acrobat in my hand.
>> Could you post screenshots if possible?
>>
>> Regards,
>> mpsuzuki
>>
>> Ivan Nincic wrote:
>>> Hi Suzuki, 
>>> I think the font may have worked for older Acrobat Reader versions. 
>>> IvanN
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: suzuki toshiya [mailto:address@hidden 
>>> Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2012 5:42 AM
>>> To: Werner LEMBERG
>>> Cc: address@hidden; address@hidden
>>> Subject: Re: [ft-devel] Regression issue - CFF
>>>
>>> Another followup for the standard behaviour.
>>> Although Adobe Acrobat 9 on Microsoft Windows does not show any glyphs for
>>> sample PDF, sample OTF can be browsed by fontview.exe (on Microsoft Windows
>>> XP SP2).
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> mpsuzuki
>>>
>>> suzuki toshiya wrote (2012/04/14 21:23):
>>>> Ah, I slipped to check what is the standard behaviour, thank you.
>>>> I got same results on Adobe Acrobat 9 on Microsft Windows and Preview 
>>>> (5.0.3) on Mac OS X.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> mpsuzuki
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: suzuki toshiya [mailto:address@hidden 
>>> Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2012 2:00 AM
>>> To: address@hidden
>>> Cc: address@hidden
>>> Subject: Re: [ft-devel] Regression issue - CFF
>>>
>>> It seems that bb211ce6ce7f712e4cc4423e93c6c13780122512
>>> (2011-09-07, between 2.4.6 and 2.4.7) relates this change of the behaviour.
>>> The changeset was introduced to fix savannah bug #33816. I should take a
>>> look more in detail and think how to fix both issues.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> mpsuzuki
>>>
>>> suzuki toshiya wrote:
>>>> I will check which changeset relates this difference.
>>>>
>>>> Ivan Nincic wrote:
>>>>> Hello Werner,
>>>>>
>>>>> FYI: I run into a regression issue with the latest FT (trunk) version.
>>>>> Attached is a sample font. I don't claim that this is a valid font 
>>>>> however FT was able to render the file in 2.4.4 but not in 2.4.9.
>>>>>
>>>>> IvanN
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Freetype-devel mailing list
>>>>> address@hidden
>>>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Freetype-devel mailing list
>>>> address@hidden
>>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freetype-devel mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
> 
>