Re: [ft-devel] ttinterp.c optimization

[Werner LEMBERG]

> Furthermore, it turns out that MPS instruction is *very* *very*
> common.  Why do we call CURRENT_Ppem here?  The comment suggest that
> the decision was arbitrary and, perhaps, wasteful.  I see a huge
> number of trivial FT_MulFix's by 1.0 still.

Measuring ppem and pt values are done along the projection vector, so
they *must* be recomputed each time since this value can change any
time.  However, it certainly makes sense to catch factor `1.0'
explicitly instead of performing a multiplication.  So please
optimize :-)


    Werner