[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ft] Re: sub-pixel-hinting of ft 2.2.1 and ft 2.1.10 differs
From: |
Mike FABIAN |
Subject: |
[ft] Re: sub-pixel-hinting of ft 2.2.1 and ft 2.1.10 differs |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Nov 2006 00:44:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.5 (fiddleheads, linux) |
Ismail Donmez <address@hidden> さんは書きました:
> 02 Kas 2006 Per 19:00 tarihinde, Mike FABIAN şunları yazmıştı:
>> I wonder why the results for sub-pixel-hinting differ between
>> Freetype 2.1.10 and Freetype 2.2.1.20061027 (CVS from 2006-10-27).
>>
>> The byte code interpreter is compiled in in both versions
>> of freetype.
>>
>> Here are two screen shots:
>>
>> http://lisa.goe.net/~mfabian/freetype2-luxi-mono-sub-pixel-hinting-problem/
>>luxi-mono-sub-pixel-hinting-ft-2.1.10.png
>> http://lisa.goe.net/~mfabian/freetype2-luxi-mono-sub-pixel-hinting-problem/
>>luxi-mono-sub-pixel-hinting-ft-2.2.1.20061027.png
>>
>
> Hmm I know Suse switched to new LCD rendering for for libXft so I guess this
> is the same issue I reported[1] , solution is to use old libXft LCD rendering
> patch.
The screen shots have been made with ftview which isn't linked against
libXft:
address@hidden:~$ ldd /usr/bin/ftview | grep -i xft
address@hidden:~$ ldd /usr/bin/xfd | grep -i xft
libXft.so.2 => /usr/lib64/libXft.so.2 (0x00002ae7db8f2000)
address@hidden:~$
> [1] http://www.nabble.com/Testing-new-LCD-rendering-mode-tf2382905.html
>
> Regards,
> ismail
--
Mike FABIAN <address@hidden> http://www.suse.de/~mfabian
睡眠不足はいい仕事の敵だ。