|
| From: | Werner LEMBERG |
| Subject: | Re: [ft] caching subsystem, caching images? |
| Date: | Wed, 01 Aug 2007 11:34:02 +0200 (CEST) |
> If the glyph is "small" enough it will use the sbit cache and it is
> not rerendered. That is very fast (~100times faster). But I wonder
> why the glyph size limit was set to 48px in the example?
This was arbitrary.
Werner
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |