[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft] diff Pixel height
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft] diff Pixel height |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:14:02 +0100 (CET) |
> So,You mean irrespective of what ever we do...the BBox is Always
> negative.
For this glyph, yes.
> In your previous reply you said, the only way to get the exact
> metrics is to render _all_ glyphs.
Sorry for being ambiguous. It either means:
. To get the smallest global bounding box of a font you have to
render all glyphs of a font
or
. To get the smallest bounding box of a glyph string you have to
render all glyphs of the string.
> Reason is, Output from my program will be used by another tool,
> which doesnt understand the hinting process. So if i would like to
> provide the exact metrics of a glyph. How can i do?
As I told you already multiple times: You have to render the glyphs to
get exact bounding boxes, regardless whether you use hinting or not.
Werner
- Re: [ft] diff Pixel height, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: [ft] diff Pixel height, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/02/16
- Re: [ft] diff Pixel height, samaram s, 2010/02/17
- Re: [ft] diff Pixel height, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/02/17
- Re: [ft] diff Pixel height, samaram s, 2010/02/18
- Re: [ft] diff Pixel height, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/02/18
- Re: [ft] diff Pixel height, samaram s, 2010/02/22
- Re: [ft] diff Pixel height, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/02/22
- Re: [ft] diff Pixel height, samaram s, 2010/02/22
- Re: [ft] diff Pixel height,
Werner LEMBERG <=