[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft] FT_Set_Char_Size vs. FT_Set_Pixel_Sizes
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft] FT_Set_Char_Size vs. FT_Set_Pixel_Sizes |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Nov 2016 17:28:14 +0100 (CET) |
> I assumed the pipe symbol was the tallest glyph in the font.
In many cases it is, but you have to check of course :-)
> I guess the only way to determine the tallest or widest glyph (or
> the FT_Size_RequestRec parameters) is, as you said, by trial and
> error.
Well, the global bounding box that includes all glyphs is
`face->bbox'.
Werner
- [ft] FT_Set_Char_Size vs. FT_Set_Pixel_Sizes, Olumide, 2016/11/17
- Re: [ft] FT_Set_Char_Size vs. FT_Set_Pixel_Sizes, Olumide, 2016/11/17
- Re: [ft] FT_Set_Char_Size vs. FT_Set_Pixel_Sizes, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/11/17
- Re: [ft] FT_Set_Char_Size vs. FT_Set_Pixel_Sizes, Olumide, 2016/11/17
- Re: [ft] FT_Set_Char_Size vs. FT_Set_Pixel_Sizes, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/11/17
- Re: [ft] FT_Set_Char_Size vs. FT_Set_Pixel_Sizes, Olumide, 2016/11/18
- Re: [ft] FT_Set_Char_Size vs. FT_Set_Pixel_Sizes, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/11/19
- Re: [ft] FT_Set_Char_Size vs. FT_Set_Pixel_Sizes, Olumide, 2016/11/22
- Re: [ft] FT_Set_Char_Size vs. FT_Set_Pixel_Sizes, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/11/22
- Re: [ft] FT_Set_Char_Size vs. FT_Set_Pixel_Sizes, Olumide, 2016/11/22
- Re: [ft] FT_Set_Char_Size vs. FT_Set_Pixel_Sizes,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [ft] FT_Set_Char_Size vs. FT_Set_Pixel_Sizes, Olumide, 2016/11/22