[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [fsfc-discuss] 'DRM'/'TPM' etc
|
From: |
David C Dawson |
|
Subject: |
Re: [fsfc-discuss] 'DRM'/'TPM' etc |
|
Date: |
Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:14:39 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
With respect to 'DRM' 'TPM' and the like: If such strategies
actually had the capabilities for which they were intended, legal prohibitions
against 'tampering?????' with them would be pointless.
(wrong word - I'm too sleepy)
I suspect that if you tried to sell to a casino, a slot machine which was
'protected' by 'DRM', your company would not make many sales.
Which makes me wonder -- does anybody on the list know anybody in the
gambling industry?
--
David Dawson
- Re: [fsfc-discuss] "FSF Canada", Russell McOrmond, 2012/02/15
- Re: [fsfc-discuss] 'DRM'/'TPM' etc,
David C Dawson <=
- Re: [fsfc-discuss] 'DRM'/'TPM' etc, Russell McOrmond, 2012/02/16
- Re: [fsfc-discuss] 'DRM'/'TPM' + another thought, David C Dawson, 2012/02/17
- Re: [fsfc-discuss] 'DRM'/'TPM' + another thought, Russell McOrmond, 2012/02/17
- Re: [fsfc-discuss] 'DRM'/'TPM' + another thought, David C Dawson, 2012/02/18
- Re: [fsfc-discuss] 'DRM'/'TPM' + another thought, Michael Faille, 2012/02/18
- Re: [fsfc-discuss] 'DRM'/'TPM' + another thought, Rudolf O., 2012/02/18
- Re: [fsfc-discuss] 'DRM'/'TPM' + another thought, Russell McOrmond, 2012/02/18
- Re: [fsfc-discuss] 'DRM'/'TPM' + another thought, Russell McOrmond, 2012/02/18
- [fsfc-discuss] UEFI, Bill C-11, and our provincial governments (Was: 'DRM'/'TPM' + another thought), Russell McOrmond, 2012/02/18
- Re: [fsfc-discuss] 'DRM'/'TPM' + another thought, David C Dawson, 2012/02/18