fsfe-uk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fsfe-uk] patents directive passed, summary


From: James Heald
Subject: Re: [Fsfe-uk] patents directive passed, summary
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 15:32:43 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

Ciaran O'Riordan wrote:

Hi all,
  the directive was passed, this may be good or bad depending
on the amendments.  Slashdot posted a summary in french, a
slashdotter quickly translated it:

 The European Parliament approves the patentability of the software
STRASBOURG (Reuters) - the European Parliament approved Wednesday the
draft Directive very disputed on the patentability of the software
inventions, after having amended it to limit its field of application
to the "true inventions" having a technical range. The text, presented
in first reading, was approved by 364 votes, against 153 and 33
abstentions. It specifies the European Commission proposal, which
establishes a distinction between the pure, famous software
nonpatentable in European right, and the "inventions implemented by
computer", which would become it, with the proviso of presenting a
technical projection, likely to receive an industrial application. The
text of origin was considered to be "fuzzy" and "ambiguous" by
considerable members of Parliament who feared that it too largely does
not open the way with the taking out of patents on the software, with
the risk to constitute a brake with l"innovation in this key field of
the economy. Eurodeputes added a paragraph specifying that a
"invention implemented by computer (a software) is not regarded as
contributing a technical share only because it implies the use of a
computer". In light, so that a data-processing program is patentable,
it is not enough that it is new, it is necessary still that it allows
a technical innovation independently of its own execution. Another
amendment specifies that the use of a patented technique is not
regarded as a counterfeit if it is necessary to ensure the
communication between various systems or data-processing networks. It
acts for eurodeputes to prevent the monopoly which certain giants of
the software could exert on the data-processing networks, Microsoft
being named but probably not aimed. The European Parliament being a
colegislator in this field which concerns the domestic market, the
text must now be examined by the Council of Ministers, before
returning in second reading to Strasbourg. The European police chief
charged with the domestic market, Fritz Bolkestein, had warned
eurodeputes, Tuesday at the time of the debate, on the "unacceptable"
character of a certain number of amendments deposited.



I love the description of Fritz Bolkestein as the European police chief charged with the internal market!

Typical slashdot accuracy.

I think this is nearer the truth (but then I submitted it :grin:)
http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=79769&threshold=0&commentsort=3&tid=155&tid=185&tid=99&mode=thread&cid=7042805

Given the clauses that were passed, I think we were recommending a Yes vote overall -- though the FFII accept/reject formula was so complicated, that in truth I haven't actually checked.

The French free software people advising Rocard were certainly recommending a Yes, even if only a fraction of the amendments we actually got had been passed. (And before the debate, they had reckoned there was only a 10% chance).





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]