Re: [MERGE-REQUEST] More robust implementation of `aggregated'

[Ludovic Courtès]

[Adding `g-wrap-dev']

Andreas Rottmann <address@hidden> writes:

> Indeed, calling the release 2.0 might be a good idea, now that I've
> dropped my initial 2.0 goal of supporting more than one Scheme impl.

If you merge the `aggregated' thing, you'll also be able to merge all
the documentation improvements that ended up in those changesets.  And
if we are to call it 2.0, I think I'll try to go ahead and write more
documentation.  Personally, I consider having a well-documented, highly
flexible and customizable, and _stable_ binding generator for Guile to
be the top priority.

It'd be nice at some point to release a 2.0rc so that the GNUcash and
guile-gnome folks can make sure everything works fine.

Thanks,
Ludovic.