gcl-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gcl-commits] gable episodic


From: Jess Rios
Subject: [Gcl-commits] gable episodic
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 14:47:16 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)


No dips or huge peaks.
They watched his home in Piedmont, Calif. And that is the way the people in our company feel. The license has just been upheld in Germany again. Let it get so bad that everyone sees how dangerous software patents are.
It is a positive hoot, because SCO has carefully excised and redacted every bit of the memo that might tell us what in the world they are talking about.
If Bill Hewlett and David Packard were still alive, they would be appalled.
, hired to investigate leaks to the media, was sent to four HP executives, including HP's ethics director. They did broad background checks on their targets, but also on relatives of their targets.
I hear you say, the fact that SCO has been unwilling or unable to be specific.
That's why people should not do such things to other people, eh?
In other words, it is asking the court to throw out SCO's entire case, and to grant it judgment on two counterclaims without even going to trial on those two.
But this will get you started while I slave away.
They would be embarrassed.
Novell is seeking to add two new counterclaims. Some people have to learn the hard way.
What does all that mean?
Is that not SCO to the max? I think he would hope you would rearrange your priorities, if not your ultimate goal, and find a way to do both.
With a gazillion exhibits.
Anyway, just saying that the overall impression I get is they don't expect to win this motion. Since this seems to be my week to disagree with famous people, I'll say outright that I disagree with Richard on this point.
Anyway, just saying that the overall impression I get is they don't expect to win this motion.
I think short term strategies have value.
But I'll let him explain.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]