[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gcl-devel] [Fwd: Re: Itanium2 port??]
From: |
Mike McDonald |
Subject: |
Re: [Gcl-devel] [Fwd: Re: Itanium2 port??] |
Date: |
Sun, 09 Feb 2003 22:59:22 -0500 |
>To: "Paul F. Dietz" <address@hidden>
>Subject: Re: [Gcl-devel] [Fwd: Re: Itanium2 port??]
>From: Camm Maguire <address@hidden>
>Date: 09 Feb 2003 22:11:55 -0500
>
>Greetings!
>
>> >I wrote:
>> >
>> >> Ok... it should run on ia64 already then. Go to
>> >>
>> >> ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/gcl/cvs
>> >>
>> >> and get the appropriate .deb file.
>>
>> It gets an immediate unrecoverable segmentation violation.
>>
>
>What box? I'm almost sure that this must be an external dynamic
>library mismatch. I take it that this is not a Debian box.
It's a RH box.
>> gcc generates an unrecognized instruction for the return in
>> num_log.c.
>>
>
>This is a well known (gcc) compiler bug on this platform, which is
>worked-around in debian/rules. Try 'debian/rules build' to build a
>clean source tree.
>
>Please let me know how it goes.
The key line from debian/rules is:
( cd o && $(MCC) -c -Wall -DVOL=volatile -I.
-fsigned-char -fwritable-strings -pipe -O -fomit-frame-pointer -I../h -I../gcl-
tk num_log.c )
Compiling num_log.c using that command and then doing a build seems
to work fine. I built yesterday's CVS top of trunk.
THANKS for the help! I didn't know gcl-devel was subscribed to
cmucl-imp. :-)
Mike McDonald
address@hidden