[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: system, load-time-value
From: |
Michael Koehne |
Subject: |
Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: system, load-time-value |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 00:05:18 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
Moin Dennis Decker Jensen,
> However, I suspect that most of the cl-* packages on Debian only
> runs smoothly on SBCL and CMUCL, and in CLISP only with tweakings
> or a little more trouble (that's my impression from usenet and
> blogs, not actual experience). I have no idea how portable the
> packages are.
the idea of CLC is nice - but it had the problem, that CLC package
did not know what kind of LISP they need. So lots of packages are
throwing mails to root, if clisp is installed.
> I intend to do a smoke test compiling as many as possible.
mail me your .deb (or a simple tar.gz) once you have a stage when
the first CLC tests work out correctly.
Bye Michael
--
mailto:address@hidden UNA:+.? 'CED+2+:::Linux:2.4.22'UNZ+1'
http://www.xml-edifact.org/ CETERUM CENSEO WINDOWS ESSE DELENDAM
- [Gcl-devel] Re: system, load-time-value, (continued)
- [Gcl-devel] Re: system, load-time-value, Debian User, 2004/02/13
- [Gcl-devel] Re: system, load-time-value, Camm Maguire, 2004/02/13
- RE: [Gcl-devel] Re: system, load-time-value, Mike Thomas, 2004/02/16
- [Gcl-devel] packages & exported symbols (was: system, load-time-value), Debian User, 2004/02/16
- Re: [Gcl-devel] packages & exported symbols (was: system, load-time-value), Camm Maguire, 2004/02/16
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: system, load-time-value, Camm Maguire, 2004/02/16
- [Gcl-devel] Re: system, load-time-value, Debian User, 2004/02/17
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: system, load-time-value, Camm Maguire, 2004/02/17
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: system, load-time-value, Michael Koehne, 2004/02/17
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: system, load-time-value, Dennis Decker Jensen, 2004/02/17
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: system, load-time-value,
Michael Koehne <=
[Gcl-devel] SGC and file I/O, Camm Maguire, 2004/02/11
[Gcl-devel] Runtime SGC fault address recovery tests, Camm Maguire, 2004/02/11