|
From: | Paul F. Dietz |
Subject: | [Gcl-devel] Re: gcl and the random tester |
Date: | Wed, 25 Feb 2004 20:01:45 -0600 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031210 |
Camm Maguire wrote:
Greetings, and thanks as always Paul. Is it meaningful to get a feel for the compiler reliability modulo this missing function? I'm pretty sure I won't have time to get it in for at least a couple of weeks, and it would be good to get some feel for how solid the current state is. Again I can probably contribute computer time if you feel like pooling these tests across machines.
Yes, it is worthwhile. Currently these operators are conditionalized out of the generator, so we can test without them. Without them, gcl doesn't have any compiler bugs that I know about that the random tester can stimulate (although some might exist). Paul
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |